Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2020; 24 (21): 11305-11314

DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202011_23620

Efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine vs. traditional anaesthetic infiltration for pain management in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

S.-C. Zhou, B.-G. Liu, Z.-H. Wang

Department of Anesthesia, Linyi Central Hospital, Shandong, China. m10281@sina.com


In this review, we assess the effectiveness of liposomal bupivacaine against the traditional bupivacaine infiltration in the postoperative management of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Various databases including PubMed Central, Medline, Scopus, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane library and ScienceDirect (inception date till August 2020) were searched. The quality of published trials was assessed using Cochrane risk of bias tool, and a random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. We report pooled Risk ratios (RR) or pooled Standardized Mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We analyzed a total of 13 studies with 62,582 participants. The majority of the studies were retrospective with lower bias risks. Liposomal bupivacaine was significantly associated with the reduction in opioid requirement at 48 hours (SMD = -0.25; 95% CI: -0.40 to -0.09; p=0.002) and length of hospital stay (SMD = -0.25; 95% CI: -0.43 to -0.07, p=0.006) following THA compared with the control group. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the effect of liposomal bupivacaine and other agents for pain score (24 and 48 hours), opioid requirement at 24 hours and incidence of nausea. Liposomal bupivacaine has selective benefits in terms of opioid consumption and length of hospital stay against the traditional bupivacaine among the patients undergoing THA.

 

Free PDF Download

To cite this article

S.-C. Zhou, B.-G. Liu, Z.-H. Wang
Efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine vs. traditional anaesthetic infiltration for pain management in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci
Year: 2020
Vol. 24 - N. 21
Pages: 11305-11314
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202011_23620