Feasibility and safety of treatment switch from Pirfenidone to Nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a real-world observational study

P. Ntolios, K. Archontogeorgis, S. Anevlavis, K. Bonelis, N. Paxinou, A. Voulgaris, M. Froudarakis, P. Steiropoulos

Department of Pneumonology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece. pascnt@hotmail.com

---

• Respiratory Medicine

OBJECTIVE: Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis is a disease characterized by a devastating fibrosing process. Two anti-fibrotic agents, pirfenidone and nintedanib, have been found to alter the disease progression. In this study, we sought to determine whether switching treatment to nintedanib is feasible and safe in patients that had to discontinue treatment with pirfenidone due to side effects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed patients that had to discontinue pirfenidone due to side effects. Patients were prospectively enrolled for treatment with nintedanib between March 2015 and June 2019. Side effects and Pulmonary Function Tests were recorded.

RESULTS: 12 patients received nintedanib after discontinuing treatment with pirfenidone. Side-effects that led to discontinuation were diarrhea (33.3%), nausea (16.6%), photosensitivity (33.3%) and difficulty adhering to pirfenidone’s dosage scheme (16.6%). After the initiation of nintedanib, diarrhea was the most common side effect (66.6%). Four patients of these patients could not tolerate the full dose of 300 mg daily and had to reduce it to 200 mg daily. No patient has had experienced liver damage. During the last twelve months of treatment with pirfenidone, mean ΔFCV was +2.47 ± 3.69%, mean ΔDLco was -0.36 ± 2.64% and mean difference of the distance walked during the 6MWT was 5 ± 56.48 meters. During the first year of treatment with nintedanib, mean ΔFCV was -1.32 ± 1.12% (p=0.68), mean ΔDLco was -1.59 ± 3.45% (p=0.54) and mean difference of the distance walked during the 6MWT was 14.17 ± 59 meters (p=0.078). 50% of patients had stable disease under pirfenidone (6-month FVC decline < 5% and/or 6-month DLco decline < 10%) vs. 50% under nintedanib, 33.3% had marginal 6-month decline (5% ≤ 6-month FVC ≤ 10% and/or (≤ 10% 6- month DLco decline ≤15%) under pirfenidone vs. 33.3% under nintedanib and 16.6% had disease progression (6-month FVC decline > 10% and/or 6-month DLco decline > 15%) under pirfenidone vs. 16.6% under nintedanib.

CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that nintedanib is a safe option for the treatment of patients that had to discontinue pirfenidone due to adverse reactions. Further studies with greater patient numbers are needed for accurate results concerning efficacy.

Free PDF Download