Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2023; 27 (13): 6223-6228
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202307_32981

Comparison of Bipolar vascular sealing and conventional back-table dissection in terms of post-renal transplant drainage and back-table preparation times

E. Eren, M. Tokac, U. Ozcelik, T. Sahin, G. Tellioglu, C. Peksen, A. Dinckan

Department of General Surgery, Istinye University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. eryigiteren58@gmail.com


OBJECTIVE: The usage of vessel sealing devices has been gaining popularity in all surgical specialties. Post-renal transplant drain placement is a common practice among transplant surgeons. However, prolonged drainage accompanied by surgical wound complications and perirenal fluid collections is a frequent complication experienced by the recipients. This study aimed to compare Bipolar vascular sealing with conventional back-table dissection in terms of post-renal transplant drainage duration, amount, surgical wound complication, and back-table preparation time.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: A double-blind clinical study randomizes recipients into 2 groups, using Bipolar vascular sealing (Group 1) and conventional ligation (Group 2) back-table dissection. Variables such as recipient age, gender, body mass index (BMI), cause of end-stage renal disease, amount and duration of surgical drainage, back-table time, and cold ischemia time (CIT) were collected prospectively.

RESULTS: Ninety-eight consecutive living donor (M/F: 69/29) renal transplant recipients were enrolled in this prospective randomized clinical trial. There were 49 patients in each group. The mean BMI was 26.76±4.57. There was no difference among the groups regarding recipient age, BMI, total drainage, and surgical drainage duration. The surgical site infection rate was not different between the two groups. Group 1 had significantly shorter back-table time, with mean back-table time being 15.26±2.51 minutes in Group 1 and 28.83±6.27 minutes in Group 2 (p<0.001). The CIT was also significantly different between the 2 groups (p<0.001). In Group 1, the recorded CIT was 43.3±11.4, and in Group 2, 57.1±13.3 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS: The use of Bipolar vascular sealing to seal lymphatic vessels at the back-table is feasible, safe, and easy to perform. It also expedites the dissection and shortens the time required for back-table graft preparation.

Free PDF Download

To cite this article

E. Eren, M. Tokac, U. Ozcelik, T. Sahin, G. Tellioglu, C. Peksen, A. Dinckan
Comparison of Bipolar vascular sealing and conventional back-table dissection in terms of post-renal transplant drainage and back-table preparation times

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci
Year: 2023
Vol. 27 - N. 13
Pages: 6223-6228
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202307_32981