Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2024; 28 (6): 2317-2321
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202403_35735

Evaluation of treatment processes in childhood fifth metacarpal bone (Boxer) fractures with QuickDASH scoring system

Ö. Avinca, M. Taş

Emergency Department, Health Sciences University, Gazi Yasargil Research and Training Hospital, Diyarbakır, Turkey. droneravinca@gmail.com


OBJECTIVE: Metacarpal fractures are one of the most common orthopedic injuries seen in emergency departments. Despite this, only a few data have been published about the epidemiology of metacarpal fractures. Simple radiographs are the standard imaging modality used to diagnose boxer fractures and determine the degree of angulation. Fractures and angulations should be identified by anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. The aim of this study was to follow the healing after closed reduction of fifth metacarpal neck fractures in a pediatric population using the QuickDASH score to determine whether it results in clinically significant improvement.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Between 2020 and 2022, our clinical record database for all metacarpal fractures treated at our institution was searched retrospectively every month. Children aged 18 years and younger with fifth metacarpal neck fractures treated with closed reduction and immobilization in our tertiary care emergency clinic were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS: 52 pediatric patients were included in the study. The mean age at the time of injury was 14.04 years (SD=2.10, range=10-18 years). 92.30% (n=48) of the patients were male, and 7.70% (n=4) were female.

CONCLUSIONS: Accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment are crucial in the management of childhood fifth metacarpal fractures to ensure proper healing, prevent long-term complications, and facilitate optimal functional recovery.

Free PDF Download

To cite this article

Ö. Avinca, M. Taş
Evaluation of treatment processes in childhood fifth metacarpal bone (Boxer) fractures with QuickDASH scoring system

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci
Year: 2024
Vol. 28 - N. 6
Pages: 2317-2321
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202403_35735