Comparative efficacy of selegiline versus rasagiline in the treatment of early Parkinson’s disease
S. Marconi, T. Zwingers Medical Department, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Parma, Italy. s.marconi@chiesi.com
OBJECTIVES: The monoamine oxidase B inhibitors selegiline and rasagiline have not been compared in head-to-head clinical trials in patients with early Parkinson’s disease. The aim of this review was to compare the efficacy of these two agents in this setting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Randomized, placebo-controlled trials with an endpoint of the mean change from baseline in the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) total score were included. Analysis included calculation of the standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and Forest Plot analyses for comparisons of pooled results.
RESULTS: Five studies with selegiline (n = 1029) and four with rasagiline (n = 820) were included. Treatment duration was 2.5-9 months. Both selegiline and rasagiline showed significant SMDs versus placebo (−0.690, 95% CI −0.811, –0.569 and −1.025, 95% CI −1.230, −0.820; respectively), indicating a significant effect of both drugs on UPDRS. The SMD between selegiline and rasagiline was not significantly different (SMD 0.079; 95% CI −0.010, +0.167).
CONCLUSIONS: It appears that selegiline and rasagiline have comparable efficacy in improving Parkinsonian symptoms in patients with early stage disease.
Free PDF DownloadThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
To cite this article
S. Marconi, T. Zwingers
Comparative efficacy of selegiline versus rasagiline in the treatment of early Parkinson’s disease
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci
Year: 2014
Vol. 18 - N. 13
Pages: 1879-1882