Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2010; 14 (9): 759-763

Effects of olmesartan vs irbesartan on metabolic parameters and visfatin in hypertensive obese women

D.A. de Luis, R. Conde, M. Gonzalez Sagrado, R. Aller, O. Izaola, J.L. Perez Castrillon, E. Romero, M.J. Castro

Institute of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Medicine School and Unit of Investigation, Hospital Rio Hortega. RD-056/0013 RETICEF. University of Valladolid. Valladolid (Spain)


Background: Angiotensin II regulates the production of adipokines. The objective was to study the effect of treatment with irbesartan versus olmesartan in obese hypertensive women.

Subjects: A sample of 34 obese hypertensive women was analyzed in a prospective way with a randomized trial. Patients were randomized to irbesartan (300 mg/day) or olmesartan (40 mg/day) for 3 months. Weight, body mass index, blood pressure, basal glucose, insulin, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, HOMA and visfatin were determined at basal time and after 3 months of treatment.

Results: Thirty four patients gave informed consent and were enrolled in the study. A significative decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressures was reached without changes in weight.

Patients treated with olmesartan had a significative decrease of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, insulin, HOMA and visfatin levels. Decrease in total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol was similar with both angiotensin receptor blockers. Decrease in insulin (2.28±2.77 vs 0.66±4.4 mUI/L: p Conclusion: The administration of olmesartan improved blood pressure, insulin, HOMA, visfatin and lipid profile in hypertensive obese women. Irbesartan improved blood pressure and lipid levels.

Corresponding Author: Daniel A. de Luis, MD; e-mail: dadluis@yahoo.e

Free PDF Download

To cite this article

D.A. de Luis, R. Conde, M. Gonzalez Sagrado, R. Aller, O. Izaola, J.L. Perez Castrillon, E. Romero, M.J. Castro
Effects of olmesartan vs irbesartan on metabolic parameters and visfatin in hypertensive obese women

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci
Year: 2010
Vol. 14 - N. 9
Pages: 759-763