Study of endoleaks after endovascular repair by using MDCTA
L. Saba 1, R. Sanfilippo 3, L. Pascalis 4, R. Montisci 3, G. Mallarini 1,2 1 Department of Science of the Images, A.O.U. di Cagliari, Cagliari (Italy) 2 Institute of Radiology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari (Italy) 3 Department of Vascular Surgery, A.O.U. di Cagliari, Cagliari (Italy) 4 Department of Internal Medicine, A.O.U. di Cagliari, Cagliari (Italy)
Abstract. – Purpose: Our purpose was to investigate the multi-detector-row CT angiography (MDCTA) application in endoleak detection.
Methods: Fifty-nine patients that underwent endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm with endoluminal stent graft were retrospectively studied. MDCTA scans were obtained after administration of 110-130 mL of contrast material using a 4-6 mL/sec flow rate. We made unenhanced, arterial (15-20 sec) and delayed (100 sec) acquisitions. For each patient four MDCTA datasets (pre-EVAR, 1, 6, and 12 months follow-up) were obtained. Each examination was studied by two observers. Kappa value was calculated in order to evaluate inter-observer agreement.
Results: Twenty-one endoleaks were detected in eighteen patients. Fifteen and eighteen endoleaks were detected by using biphasic arterial CT and biphasic delayed CT respectively (sensitivity of 71.4% and 85.7% respectively). We observed a positive correlation between the presence of endoleak and the increasement in aneurysm size. Interobserver agreement was 88.1% and kappa value was 0.685.
Conclusions: Biphasic CT for endoleak detection is significantly superior to arterial and delayed phases respectively. We observed a good interobserver agreement.
Corresponding Author: Luca Saba MD; e-mail: lucasaba@tiscali.it
Free PDF DownloadThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
To cite this article
L. Saba 1, R. Sanfilippo 3, L. Pascalis 4, R. Montisci 3, G. Mallarini 1,2
Study of endoleaks after endovascular repair by using MDCTA
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci
Year: 2010
Vol. 14 - N. 9
Pages: 775-784